Multisegment Foot Models and Clinical Application After Foot and Ankle Trauma: A Review.

Professor, Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.vanhoeve@hotmail.com. Professor, Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Professor, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, NUTRIM, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2019;(4):748-754

Abstract

Since the end of the 1990s, several multisegment foot models (MSFMs) have been developed. Several models were used to describe foot and ankle kinematics in patients with foot and ankle pathologies; however, the diagnostic value for clinical practice of these models is not known. This review searched in the literature for studies describing kinematics in patients after foot and ankle trauma using an MSFM. The diagnostic value of the MSFMs in patients after foot and ankle trauma was also investigated. A search was performed on the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library. To investigate the diagnostic value of MSFMs in patients after foot and ankle trauma, studies were classified and analyzed following the diagnostic research questions formulated by Knottnerus and Buntinx. This review was based on 7 articles. All studies were published between 2010 and 2015. Five studies were retrospective studies, and 2 used an intervention. Three studies described foot and ankle kinematics in patients after fractures. Four studies described foot and ankle kinematics in patients after ankle sprain. In all included studies, altered foot and ankle kinematics were found compared with healthy subjects. No results on patient outcome using MSFMs and costs were found. Seven studies were found reporting foot and ankle kinematics in patients after foot and ankle trauma using an MSFM. Results show altered kinematics compared with healthy subjects, which cannot be seen by other diagnostic tests and add valuable data to the present literature; therefore, MSFMs seem to be promising diagnostic tools for evaluating foot and ankle kinematics. More research is needed to find the additional value for MSFMs regarding patient outcome and costs.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Review

Metadata